From: Mario Giammarco <mgiammarco@supereva.it>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] priority bands don't reduce interactive latency?
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:03:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-101431582507724@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-98373938216950@msgid-missing>
Il lun, 2002-02-18 alle 11:00, Martin Devera ha scritto:
> should be. However people often use class load balancing without
> priorities. I tested priorities but this was rather quick test.
> So that it is possible to have bug in priorization part :)
> You should to test it by ping to the router machine to be sure
> that it goes only thru htb qdisc.
>
Hello,
I made some tests and I have now 2 questions to ask you:
1) I use a 486dx2 66mhz as router, is the cpu enough powerful?
2) In your latency tests I have seen that you generate traffic to
saturate link but you do not OVERLOAD it. Can you please redo your
simulation with more traffic?
Thank you very much for the interest and the patience.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-21 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-18 6:15 [LARTC] priority bands don't reduce interactive latency? Dan
2002-02-15 18:23 ` Mario Giammarco
2002-02-15 18:27 ` Martin Devera
2002-02-16 12:47 ` Mario Giammarco
2002-02-16 16:13 ` Ross Skaliotis
2002-02-16 19:26 ` Martin Devera
2002-02-18 8:34 ` Mario Giammarco
2002-02-18 10:00 ` Martin Devera
2002-02-21 15:03 ` Mario Giammarco [this message]
2002-02-22 9:38 ` Martin Devera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-101431582507724@msgid-missing \
--to=mgiammarco@supereva.it \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.