From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Devera Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 22:03:42 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] fw_mark [was HTB: Filtering flat out not working :(] Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org I found it in sources. When fwmark has no subfilters then maps fwmark directly into classid. So that 0x0002010 is classid 2:10 On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Michael T. Babcock wrote: > On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 09:03:30AM +0100, Martin Devera wrote: > > By the way, you can attach fw_mark classifier WITHOUT specifying > > any marks and then it will try to directly map mark to class numbers. > > You can then specify class numbers directly in ip{chains,tables} ;) > > I saw this discussed here on the list before and when I tried to find > more details I came up dry -- do you happen to remember/know the mapping? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/