From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mihai RUSU Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 12:24:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Hash without hashmask Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, bert hubert wrote: > I really have no clue. At one point I understood hashing filters but since > then it appears I've swapped them out again. > > Also, it looks like almost nobody is a real hash expert, with the exception > of Alexey, who wrote the stuff. > Hi Every test I made didnt worked. For now I'll just say that the link parameter for a u32 classifier can only point to devisor hash table handles (created with tc filter protocol ip handle u32 devisor ). If you want to includ also a more general example you can use my setup. I made a test setup where I used 2 hashes in a tree configuration. This I think can be interesting for other people too, who by just reading the FAQ cant tell for sure if its possible to make a hash and to be able to add filters in the hash that they are hashes to... :) We (my employer) will use this hashes in a production enviroment and this will make a perfect test for the hashes. If I encounter other howto related problems Ill post here. Also I dont find anything in the HOWTO about the "offset" and "shift" parameters for u32 classifiers. Do you know what they do ? ---------------------------- Mihai RUSU Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of any company, unless otherwise specifically stated. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/