Re: [LARTC] Sharing incoming traffic

["Julián Muñoz" <jmunoz@telefonica.net>]

Ok,

what I really wanted was to prioritize some kinds of incoming traffic
(DNS or HTTP) (or penalyze some other, which is same), exactly for what
you say, "gain interactivity on a heavy loaded link"

but doing test, I saw this strange "non fairness sensation", which is
maybe problematic ??

That's why I ask if someone has already seen this behaviour, or it is
specific of my system ? The test is very easy, do 2 ftp in parallel.


I am going to recompile 2.4 on my main computer, hopping this is a caused
by vmware :-)





On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Tobias Geiger wrote:

>
> I reread your Subject line and noticed you meant SHARING. i always read
> SHAPING.
> Make sure u can't actually SHARE your incoming bandwith. you can just
> throttle it down (to gain more interactivity on a heavy loaded link)
>
> I hope we didn't missunderstand each other
>
> Tobias
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>

-- 

      __o
    _ \<_
   (_)/(_)

Saludos de Julián
EA4ACL
-.-

Foro Wireless Madrid
http://opennetworks.rg3.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/