From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mario Wolff Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:17:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] imq+htb does no traffic controll Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hello devik, Am Montag, 25 M=E4rz 2002 schrieben Sie: > > #build a root-queue on the imq > > tc qdisc add dev imq root handle 1: htb default 1 > did you ifconfig imq up !? Yes, for sure. If the interface were down, the filters could not=20 put the traffic to the build classes. =20 > > -how to build a "dont touch" class? > there is one in htb X:0 (like 1:0). Just use > default 0 or use flow 1:0 in filters Oh, that was new to me! I tought i have to put my packets to leave- classes. Thanks, i=B4ll try that. > > -is the pppoe-ethernet critical to pass thru the imq=20 > hmm ... I don't know interactions here ... probably > it goes thru imq like all others ok, then i put it to flow 1:0. > > -how many prios are allowed? First i had prio 10, 20 and 30 on the =20 > 4 prios (0-3). First it should be enough, at second: each > new prio makes htb slower and more memory demanding i dont need more than that, but i tought the prio backside would=20 be build at runtime and so i decide to leave space for something=20 like "more prio than x but less prio than y". I=B4m not a great programmer but maybe there would be a way to configure=20 that at the kernel conf, just like number of unix98-terms or something. > devik thanks! Mario _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/