RE: [LARTC] question re: dead gateway detection

[Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas@urgent.rug.ac.be>]

Thanks for some of the hints.

> > > So my question is: is there some way that I can detect that the actual 
> > > route to the net is unusable, even though the gateway is up ? If not,
> when 
> > > either one of the lines is down, users will notice they're not getting a
> 
> > > connection randomly, depending on what gateway is used for that 
> > > connection.

However, my basic question hasn't been answered, and to put it simply : is 
there some way a user-space program can signify the dead gateway code to 
mark one of the gateways as dead or alive ? That would make this the 
easiest.

It's not that it's especially hard to write daemons to check routes to 
then change networkconfigurations on the fly, but it's not the cleanest 
solution IMO ;)

And on another note, I'm using iptables to DNAT on my firewall.  Now, an 
unintended side effect is that for web servers (maybe others as well), 
traffic now seems to come from the firewall instead of the actual outside 
ip address.  Is there some way I can get the real ip address to the server 
? I used to do ip-based blocking but that's pretty ineffective now ;)

Thanks,

Thomas

 -- 

The Dave/Dina Project : future TV today ! - http://davedina.apestaart.org/
<-*-                      -*->
"First lesson : you have to treat your kite like a woman."
"You mean, take her home and meet your mom, sir ?"
"No, get inside her five times a day and
 take her to heaven and down again !"
<-*- thomas@apestaart.org -*->
URGent, the best radio on the Internet - 24/7 ! - http://urgent.rug.ac.be/

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/