From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 13:56:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] bug in new IMQ ?
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-101836071032640@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-101826826118987@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-101826826118987@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

> > nice to see another active developer in field !
> > Let Power be with you Patrick ;)
> :)
> 
> I thought about changing qos subsystem to support real ingress queueing
> without imq or something. Kind of two root qdiscs per device. What do
> you
> (and others) think about this ?

There already is somethink like it (ingres) only it doesn't queue ..
IMO the main problem will be to understand whole machinery in
sch_generic.c and likes.
Also Jamal and Alexey are against this ... But I think it is worth
of doing it. Especially in 2.4 where we have both rx and tx softirqs
it should not be so comlicated to do it.
devik

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/