From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:27:44 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] A tc htb/iptables rate control script for ADSL
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-101907927406278@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-101900137903338@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-101900137903338@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

> > Otherwise iptables will do the whole "to-dsl" list for every packet. In
> > your case ot wouldn't matter except for some extra CPU usage. But if you
> > would like to mark port 80 as bulk-traffic and ACK's as interactive
> > traffic, then those port 80 ACK's could be marked as bulk which you
> > wouldn't want it to.
>
> Does this behavior also occure when using ipchains?

yes

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/