From: Thilo Schulz <arny@ats.s.bawue.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Fwmark problem - policy routing does not work.
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:42:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-101964860925184@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-101958268206904@msgid-missing>
> \> So it might be, that the Marks are not being set, i checked that too, i
>
> > replaced the
> > iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -m owner --uid-owner 1001 -j MARK
> > --set-mark 1 with
> > iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j MARK --set-mark 1
> > - still no success. So I tried placing this rule into the PREROUTING
> > chain (for testing though, INPUT should be absolutely correct), and - oh
> > wonder - no success either ;)
>
> If you do "iptables -L -v -n -t mangle", do the counters increment ?
>
> Stef
Yes, they do.
I am also sure now, that marking is working:
I have tried the same on another host that uses a gateway to access the
internet, but has several ips on the net. If i do not enter the route (via
option) the packets are not reaching their destination, if i am creating
those as a given user, as all other user it does work. If i give the via
option in the "ip route add table thilo src ....." command, the packets are
reaching their destination again - yet even though i have given the source ip
that should have been used, it is still using the primary one.
Could this be a bug in the routing code?
- Thilo Schulz
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-24 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-23 17:23 [LARTC] Fwmark problem - policy routing does not work Thilo Schulz
2002-04-24 11:42 ` Thilo Schulz [this message]
2002-04-24 11:50 ` Stef Coene
2002-04-24 12:40 ` Thilo Schulz
2002-04-26 19:44 ` Adrian Chung
2002-04-26 20:01 ` Thilo Schulz
2002-04-26 20:08 ` Adrian Chung
2002-04-27 8:25 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
2002-04-27 8:51 ` Thilo Schulz
2002-04-27 10:04 ` Julian Anastasov
2002-04-27 11:40 ` Adrian Chung
2002-04-27 12:02 ` Arthur van Leeuwen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-101964860925184@msgid-missing \
--to=arny@ats.s.bawue.de \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.