All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nils Lichtenfeld" <Nils.Lichtenfeld@gmx.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] A tc htb/iptables rate control script for ADSL
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:31:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-101982789812156@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-101900137903338@msgid-missing>

Hello Devik!


> > > and set classid directly in iptables like:
> > > iptables -t mangle -A to-dsl -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 0x10010
> > > iptables -t mangle -A to-dsl -p tcp --sport 24 -j MARK --set-mark 0x10020
> >
> > Oh an and I forgot to ask: Is there any other improvement exept for having a
> > shorter script?
>
> It is a bit faster and simpler to maintain.

We are using Ipchains. I guess that makes no difference. At the moment we do the
following:

For Example (all rules for the same device):
1. filter ACKs by using u32
2. filter a specific IP by using ipchains -m (because we masquarade) with its
own tc fw
3. filter ToS by using u32
4. filter by another IP with ipchains -m with its own tc fw

With only one tc fw per device (and using 8bit values with ipchains -m to
specifie the targetclass) i guess the order like shown above could not be
maintained. It would look like

2. 4. 1. 3. or 1. 2. 4. 3. depending on the positon of the tc fw filter. The
same order like in the example can not be achieved. Am I right with that
assumption?

Is it possible to have more than one of these "global" tc fw filters for one
device?


Greetings Nils

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-26 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-16 23:50 [LARTC] A tc htb/iptables rate control script for ADSL alex
2002-04-17  8:34 ` Martin Devera
2002-04-17  9:07 ` Alex Bennee
2002-04-17  9:33 ` Martin Devera
2002-04-17 12:46 ` Stef Coene
2002-04-17 12:54 ` Martin Devera
2002-04-17 13:10 ` Stef Coene
2002-04-17 13:43 ` Alex Bennee
2002-04-17 13:46 ` Martin Devera
2002-04-17 13:50 ` Stef Coene
2002-04-17 15:57 ` Don Cohen
2002-04-17 16:03 ` Martin Devera
2002-04-17 16:09 ` Martin Devera
2002-04-17 16:42 ` Jonas Lindqvist
2002-04-17 21:25 ` Nils Lichtenfeld
2002-04-17 21:27 ` Martin Devera
2002-04-17 21:30 ` Nils Lichtenfeld
2002-04-17 21:48 ` Nils Lichtenfeld
2002-04-19  8:32 ` Martin Devera
2002-04-26 13:31 ` Nils Lichtenfeld [this message]
2002-04-26 14:43 ` Martin Devera
2002-04-27 16:05 ` Nils Lichtenfeld
2002-04-27 16:06 ` Martin Devera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-101982789812156@msgid-missing \
    --to=nils.lichtenfeld@gmx.net \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.