From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz>
Date: Sat, 04 May 2002 07:38:35 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] iptables vs tc
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-102049796724620@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-102049083822072@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-102049083822072@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

tc being more universal (can do non-IP, rsvp, diffserv) but
more coomplex to understand. iptables are well known but
as name implies - IP only.
devik

On Fri, 3 May 2002, Chris Ellsworth wrote:

> Since monitoring this list and others i see people use both iptables
> and tc to assign packets on a bridge to the correct class for
> bandwidth control, what is the plus/minus of each?
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/