From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 18:07:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] cbq (root class) rate problem] Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org > > Also provide a weight parameter (I take weight = rate/2) and attach the > > filters to the root qdisc and point them direclty to the end class. > > > > Stef > > It is useless to attach a qdisc (like sfq) to the extra class? No. Default, the classes uses a PRIO qdisc (or FIFO, I'm not sure) to send the data. And you can replace it with SFQ. > What is the difference between attaching the filter to the root qdisc or > to the leaf classes? If tried it a few times. And the result was that I had to supply the weight parameter and uses filters attached to the root qdisc to get the results like I wanted. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/