Re: [LARTC] iproute + mark question

[Ciprian Niculescu <Ciprian.Niculescu@int-evry.fr>]

i did my work, my problem was that are diferences between HOWTO and realyty.

so let's see your problem

Jason A. Pattie wrote:

> 
> We have almost the same scenario except we need to use tcp instead of 
> udp and we want to direct all port 80 traffic from the internal network 
> out our new cable modem instead of using the older (slower) iDSL circuit.


steps:
- mark pachets to port 80 comming from the internal interface
- put them in a different routing table
- put the default in the new table where do you want to go


> 
>> so iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p udp --dport 50000:51000 -j MARK 
>> --set-to 0x1
>                                                                        
>    I think this          ^^^^^ needs to be 
> --set-mark?

yes, you right, i wrote the line from memory, not copy&paste :))


> 
> It seems that 'iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK 
> --set-mark 0x1' works, because iptables -t mangle -L -v outputs packet 
> count sizes and shows that the specific rules are being matched.
> 
>> ip rule add fwmark 0x1 table 230
>> ip route add default via 194... table 230 


i sugest that you mark pachets in the PREROUTING with:
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i <internal interface> -p tcp \
	--dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 0x1

after put the
ip rule add fwmark 0x1 table 230
ip route add default via 194... table 230

to be the last lines executed in the script, in this way the rule will 
be threated first, see with "ip rule" the order


hope that helps


C


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/