From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:27:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] IMQ losing marks ??
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-102283378819234@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-102269043430957@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-102269043430957@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

Ehhh sorry , I wanted to ask: do you know ...... ?
devik

On Wed, 29 May 2002, [ISO-8859-1] Juli=E1n Mu=F1oz wrote:

> Yes, but will we understand ?? :-)
>
>
> On Wed, 29 May 2002, Martin Devera wrote:
>
> > > > >
> > > > >So, the " --set-mark 0x10020" trick is not working in this case ??
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, it is the conclusion. With "tc filter" the packets go to the des=
ired
> > > queue, Devik's trick doesn't work in this case :-)
> >
> > I'm interested here. Do you want why didn't it work ?
> >
> > devik
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/