Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP

From: Alexey Talikov <alexey_talikov@texlab.com.uz>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Bandwidth allocation by IP
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 13:48:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-102328533609024@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-102327333231207@msgid-missing>

use latest version iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try
it work without problem (for me)
esfq is more simple in configuration that wrr 
but in wrr more features for traffic control
and its use another principle
read more about WRR and also see doc in package wrr and
see http://docum.org/. 

05.06.2002 18:09:07, "Vladimir Trebicky" <druid@mail.cz> wrote:

>That sound like something what I exactly need.
>    1) what is the difference (adv & disadv) between esfq and wrr?
>    2) little problem in attachment, I don't know what to do. I tried latest
>(that 2002-try) and latest stable version (ss010824).
>
>
>> Try WRR on eth1 see http://wipl-wrr.sourceforge.net/ for details
>> or use ESFQ
>> see mail from Alexander Atanasov 05.06.2002
>> I rename files gzip its and attach to this mail but don't change anything
>> patch kernel and tc
>> cd iproute2
>> patch -p1 < ../esfq-tc.diff
>> cd linux-2.4.18
>> patch -p1 < ../esfq-2.4.18.diff
>> recompile kernel and tc thats all !!
>> see README
>> Note it give you equal division for a long term not at the moment
>> Example:
>>
>> tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1:0 esfq hash src
>>
>> It make equal priority for session based on ip address not tcp session
>like classic SFQ
>> For detail see SFQ
>> 05.06.2002 15:34:05, "Vladimir Trebicky" <druid@mail.cz> wrote:
>>
>> >I have a LAN (eth1) and 1Mbit internet which is very unstable (from
>> >100kbit - 2mbit) on eth0. I would like to prevent ip A downloading with 9
>> >threads taking 90% bandwidth and ip B downloading with 1 thread  taking
>10%.
>> >I would like ip A as well as ip B to have each 50% of bandwith no care
>how
>> >many threads they are downloading. I suppose that it could be done on
>eth1.
>> >But how?
>> >Second problem: I want to lessen round-trips. Should I do it with
>priorizing
>> >small packets on eth0? How?
>> >I have 2.4.18, iproute2 with extra htb. PSCHED_JIFFIES (unfortunately -
>it's
>> >only AMD 160MHz and does not have TSC)
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >--
>> >Vladimir Trebicky
>> >druid@mail.cz
>> >
>> >
>> >---
>> >Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry.
>> >Zkontrolov?no antivirov?m syst?mem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz).
>> >Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov? b?ze: 204 - datum vyd?n?: 29.5.2002
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
>> >http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>> >
>>
>> -----------------------------------
>> mailto:alexey_talikov@texlab.com.uz
>> BR
>> Alexey Talikov
>> FORTEK
>> -----------------------------------
>>
>
>
>---
>Odchozi zprava neobsahuje viry.
>Zkontrolov?no antivirov?m syst?mem AVG (http://www.grisoft.cz).
>Verze: 6.0.368 / Virov? b?ze: 204 - datum vyd?n?: 29.5.2002
>
>

-----------------------------------
mailto:alexey_talikov@texlab.com.uz
BR
Alexey Talikov
FORTEK
-----------------------------------

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/