From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael T. Babcock" <mbabcock@fibrespeed.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 19:01:12 +0000
Subject: RE: [LARTC] SFQ buckets/extensions
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-102347655914795@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-102329319618482@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-102329319618482@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

> exactly. The discussion should be about how to implement if
> efficiently. What about to have N IP buckets and N IP/PORT
> buckets. When IP/PORT hash resolves to bucket then we could 
> (re)link the

Consider a new classful queueing discipline "SFC" that behaves exactly
as SFQ does and can have only one sub-queue attached to it.

... SFC (8 bit hash against dest ip)
     |
     \-- SFC (11 bit hash against src ip, port, dest ip, port)
          |
          \-- dequeue ...

Is this even possible with how the classes are currently built in the
kernel?
-- 
Michael T. Babcock
CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/