From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Devera Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 19:08:38 +0000 Subject: RE: [LARTC] SFQ buckets/extensions Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org It can't be done. Outer SFC could do nothing with the packet. It could only give it to inner one.... On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Michael T. Babcock wrote: > > exactly. The discussion should be about how to implement if > > efficiently. What about to have N IP buckets and N IP/PORT > > buckets. When IP/PORT hash resolves to bucket then we could > > (re)link the > > Consider a new classful queueing discipline "SFC" that behaves exactly > as SFQ does and can have only one sub-queue attached to it. > > ... SFC (8 bit hash against dest ip) > | > \-- SFC (11 bit hash against src ip, port, dest ip, port) > | > \-- dequeue ... > > Is this even possible with how the classes are currently built in the > kernel? > -- > Michael T. Babcock > CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd. > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/