From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory Maxwell Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 18:42:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] SFQ buckets/extensions Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 04:37:07PM +0200, Jan Coppens wrote: > Why not implementing the sfb (stochastic fair Blue)? From the papers I read, > the algorithm with the double buffered moving hash extension, seemed like a > better alternative for the FRED, Stochastic fair RED and SFQ. I'd like to toss in a request that anyone who impliments this please make the bloom filter size adjustable and provide a mask to remove information from the hash (i.e. sport/dport) to allow for per host fairness rather then per flow. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/