From: bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Re: priomap table
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 16:12:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-102536735802327@msgid-missing> (raw)
On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 01:20:41PM +0200, Vik Heyndrickx wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> In the current LARTC Howto, at 9.2.1.1. "Parameters & usage", there is the
> following table
>
> <txttable>
> TOS Bits Means Linux Priority Band
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 0x0 0 Normal Service 0 Best Effort 1
> 0x2 1 Minimize Monetary Cost 1 Filler 2
> 0x4 2 Maximize Reliability 0 Best Effort 1
> 0x6 3 mmc+mr 0 Best Effort 1
> 0x8 4 Maximize Throughput 2 Bulk 2
> 0xa 5 mmc+mt 2 Bulk 2
> 0xc 6 mr+mt 2 Bulk 2
> 0xe 7 mmc+mr+mt 2 Bulk 2
> 0x10 8 Minimize Delay 6 Interactive 0
> 0x12 9 mmc+md 6 Interactive 0
> 0x14 10 mr+md 6 Interactive 0
> 0x16 11 mmc+mr+md 6 Interactive 0
> 0x18 12 mt+md 4 Int. Bulk 1
> 0x1a 13 mmc+mt+md 4 Int. Bulk 1
> 0x1c 14 mr+mt+md 4 Int. Bulk 1
> 0x1e 15 mmc+mr+mt+md 4 Int. Bulk 1
> </txttable>
>
> And then
> <quote>
> The last column shows the result of the default priomap.
> On the commandline, the default priomap looks like this:
> 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1
> </quote>
>
> Now, why are this "band column" and priomap list different? Is there a
> relationship between them, or is it just a mistake, or did I miss something
> (also a good possibility)?
There is an additional level of indirection in there I think. I really
really went over this with a fine comb when I wrote it. Perhaps something
changed? Would the commandline default priomap make sense?
Regards,
bert
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Vik
>
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://www.tk the dot in .tk
http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-29 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-29 16:12 bert hubert [this message]
2002-06-30 15:34 ` [LARTC] Re: priomap table Vik Heyndrickx
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-102536735802327@msgid-missing \
--to=ahu@ds9a.nl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.