From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Devera Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 08:24:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Questions about HTB classes with an SFQ Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org sfq MUST be leaf because it is classless. devik On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Joshua Snyder wrote: > I have read most of the documents regarding both Htb and Sfq and I > still am not sure if it is best to put the Sfq on the leaf Htb or to put > it closer to the root class. All of the docs for Htb say to put it on the > leaf classes but the Sfq stuff says to put it closer to the root(but not > on the root). If my case every leaf class is only going to be one > machine/user. I want to have fairness between machines(I don't want one > person to get all of the bandwidth). I don't think putting Sfq on the > leaf classes will get me this, but I haven't been able to find a place > that says this for sure... > > josh > > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/