All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: don-lartc@isis.cs3-inc.com (Don Cohen)
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] RE: Anything out there that is similar to Cisco's WFQ?
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 20:54:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-102633501903156@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-102633270632764@msgid-missing>

=?iso-8859-1?Q?John_Bäckstrand?= writes:
 > > This is not very convincing.  Do you actually know
 > how WFQ
 > > works?  If so, please tell us.  The doc you sent did
 > not describe how
 > > it works but what the effects are, and those are
 > entirely consistent
 > > with what SFQ does.
 > > High bandwidth flows are limited, low bandwidth flows
 > get lower
 > > latency.  Can you describe some effect that's
 > different?
 > 
 > I read a bit on WFQ earlier, Im not grasping it totally
 > and I dont know every implementation detail, but I
 > think its basically WRR but taking actual bandwidth
 > usage into account, and not just packet-counts. Well,
 > try this:
 > 
 > http://www.sics.se/~ianm/WFQ/wfq_descrip/node21.html

This sounds just like SFQ except for the weights.
I have a variant of SFQ that does support weights if that's important.
It's easy to add.  (The hard part is the code that allows you to
configure the weights.)
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-07-10 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-10 20:16 [LARTC] RE: Anything out there that is similar to Cisco's WFQ? Paul
2002-07-10 20:27 ` Don Cohen
2002-07-10 20:54 ` Don Cohen [this message]
2002-07-10 20:55 ` John Bäckstrand
2002-07-10 21:09 ` John Bäckstrand
2002-07-10 21:14 ` John Bäckstrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-102633501903156@msgid-missing \
    --to=don-lartc@isis.cs3-inc.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.