All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] [tcng] correct config?
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 19:35:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-102736659017208@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-102736119010740@msgid-missing>

> ]- Opps i've made a mistake... both have to be able to use bantwidth from
> each other (if the "other" is not used at its full capacity).. then it is
> ok.. in HTB it should be :
> 40% -> rate 40% ceil 100%
> 60% -> rate 60% ceil 100%
AND both connected to a 1 class with 100% rate, 100 ceil.

> |> Then in those two channels I want have more small channels say 30 in
> |> each of them... (cbq and htb if posiible :") 'm I nasty !)
> |
> |No problem with cbq nor with htb.
>
> ]- i meaned if possible  u to provide examples in both qdisc :")
I have no examples for that with tcng.  But I have "some" docs on 
www.docum.org if you are interested.

> |> Next question : Say I have to handle other traffic not only Internet,
> |> then I should make sibling channels to my Internet one to handle this,
> |> right ?
> |
> |Mhh.  I don't understand your point.
>
> egress { //100Mbps
> //internet traffic
> htb (rate 256Kbps) { .... };
> // other traffic : say intranet traffic
> htb (rate XXX) { .... }
That's indeed the way to handle this.

> |There is also something wrong with the output generated by tcng.  But I
> | dived not deep enough in the tcng docs to know what's going wrong.
>
> ]- i cant figure out yet too...  (i'm doing those test on the computer at
> work, but still have no Internet there.. )
Reading tc docs is number one on my to do list :)

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-07-22 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-22 18:05 [LARTC] [tcng] correct config? raptor
2002-07-22 18:40 ` Stef Coene
2002-07-22 19:29 ` raptor
2002-07-22 19:35 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2002-07-25 22:57 ` Werner Almesberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-102736659017208@msgid-missing \
    --to=stef.coene@docum.org \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.