All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "yuxiao" <yxjia@site.uottawa.ca>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Re: questiona about CBQ algorithm in Linux
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 18:05:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103159474709288@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-103133728516866@msgid-missing>

Hello Alex

Sorry for my stubborn question. I read the S.Floyd paer "Link-sharing and
resource mamagement...." On page 5, they said" The estimator estimates the
bandwidth used byeach class over the appropriate time interval, to determine
whether or not each class has been receiveing its link -sharing
bandwidth..."

Also as I know CBQ building block, they have general scheduler, link-sharing
scheduler, estimater, classifier etc. complonents.

This is why I ask you how about its implementation in linux. I read the
sch_cbq.c comments, not quite sure one line" Linux has no EOI event, so that
we ca not estimater true idle class idle time..."
what's EOI event, This is why in Linux, CBQ canot measure bandwidth?

regards

yuxiao
----- Original Message -----
From: <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
To: "yuxiao" <yxjia@site.uottawa.ca>
Cc: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>; <stef.coene@docum.org>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: questiona about CBQ algorithm in Linux


> Hello!
>
> > average), how about  Linux implemenatation about estimator? 
> > also do you have link for this algorithm? I canot find it.
>
> The questions are answered in papers, references are in comments
> in sch_cbq.c, look at http://www.icir.org/floyd/cbq.html
>
>
> > 3. In linux how CBQ measure used bandwidth per class? does it measure
> > bandwith bits/sec?
>
> No, it does not measure bandwdith at all. Read papers, please.
>
>
> > 7. Can HTB do the same job as CBQ right now, can HTB do borrow ? 
>
> Yes, it does. And does it better than CBQ.
>
> Alexey

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-09 18:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-06 18:31 [LARTC] Re: questiona about CBQ algorithm in Linux kuznet
2002-09-09 18:05 ` yuxiao [this message]
2002-09-09 18:28 ` kuznet
2002-09-09 21:52 ` Martin Devera
2002-09-09 21:53 ` Martin Devera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103159474709288@msgid-missing \
    --to=yxjia@site.uottawa.ca \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.