From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 19:22:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Wondershaper Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Friday 06 September 2002 13:47, Sebastian Bleikamp wrote: > Stef Coene schrieb: > > Try efsq. It's SFQ (so each "flow" gets an equal chance to send > > something). But efsq uses only dst/src addres and not dst/src > > address/port like sfq. Ideal to kill download managers because all > > traffic form/to the same hosts is considered as one stream. > > I have a link on docum.org under FAQ. > > I will test it, thnx. > > > But another question: > I tried your solution via fwmark, and it works. At least when the router > is forwarding. I can slow down hosts on my LAN this way. If i try to > slow the gateway/router down, it fails. > > I have added a mark to all outgoing traffic on ppp0, which comes from > the router, to the OUTGOING/mangle table. But it doesn=B4t work this way. > But from the sketch on your homepage this should work. I already checked > the IPs and devices and they are correct. If you list the iptables/ipchains rules, you can check the counters to see = if=20 they are incrementing. And the sketch at my homepage is for from complete. I have to check it out= =20 for errors. Stef --=20 stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/