From: Domingos Reis da Costa <domingos@microlink.com.br>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] TC filter:Marking packets X IP/PORT filter
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:00:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103167012107785@msgid-missing> (raw)
Hello,
Is there any advantages on fwmark filtering rather than ip/port
filtering? Is load average the only advantage? If load average is low on
both cases, will fwmark reduce the RTT of the packet in comparison with
ip/port filtering?
Domingos Costa
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
reply other threads:[~2002-09-10 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103167012107785@msgid-missing \
--to=domingos@microlink.com.br \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.