From: curt brune <curt@acm.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] marking packets vs. tc filter
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 18:03:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103211309101155@msgid-missing> (raw)
Using tc filter is there a way to direct a range of ports (say ports 5000 to 5100) to a
particular flowid ?
I am aware I can use iptables to mark packets and that iptables has a syntax for port
ranges -- so I could us this method.
Theoretical question: Has anyone done an experiment to test wether filtering with "tc" or
"iptables" is more performant? I.e. given two ways to solve the problem which way is
better, tc filter or iptables w/ marking?
Cheers,
Curt
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-09-15 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-15 18:03 curt brune [this message]
2002-09-15 18:50 ` [LARTC] marking packets vs. tc filter Werner Almesberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103211309101155@msgid-missing \
--to=curt@acm.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.