From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: raptor Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 06:24:51 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] [tcng] PSCHED_CPU ? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Vladim=EDr Trebick=FD wrote: |The problem with PSCHED_CPU is that the time is derived by reading of TSC |registry which is measure counter of the processor. TSC exists on Intel |platform from the times of Pentium but sometimes cannot be used as a |counter, for example with APM (advanced power management) turned on. ]- that's good then 'cause I didn't compiled power-management into the kern= el :") Do u know any other reason not to use PSCHED_CPU ? In the past I have setup "HZ =3D 1000" when building QoS is it wise to do i= t if the only purpose of this computer is QoS+Firewall and of course it is = powerfull enought 1.8GHz. And I don't expect it to exceed 1000 slow-qos-channels and handle not more = than 1Mb/s most of the time. raptor PS.Sorry for the ignorance what is TSC-regitry and its use ? thanx.. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/