From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Kirk Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 18:04:22 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] pfifo_fast dosnt work? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:18:44PM +0200, Tobias Geiger wrote: > hi, > > just like Steve said in the previous mail, prioband is ok but it doesn't > make sure that your bandwith is consumed by one service (even if it's in a > lower class than interactive stuff) because it doesn't reserve bandwidth > for its priomaps. If it dosnt use the TOS fileds to take prioity for delivering packets in a certain way what exactly is pfifo good for? > > to achieve what u want i suggest using htb (see previous mail). ok i will look into that then. -- Venlig hilsen/Kind regards Thomas Kirk ARKENA thomas(at)arkena(dot)com Http://www.arkena.com BOFH excuse #398: Data for intranet got routed through the extranet and landed on the internet. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/