From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: brt_informatics@wlink.com.np Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 05:40:26 +0000 Subject: [LARTC] HTB or CBQ ? Message-Id: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Hi.. I've tried both (HTB & CBQ) the queuing descpliens and I think HTB is more efficient than CBQ. But i think HTB is still in beta. I just want to know if I can go for HTB right away. I mean, is it stable? I'm trying to implement it in my company and thus stability and performance is big issue in this case. Please correct me if i'm wrong. Thank you very much, Bikrant _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/