From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB or CBQ ?
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:18:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103329117917626@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-103327810612944@msgid-missing>
On Sunday 29 September 2002 07:40, brt_informatics@wlink.com.np wrote:
> Hi..
> I've tried both (HTB & CBQ) the queuing descpliens and I think HTB is
> more efficient than CBQ. But i think HTB is still in beta. I just want
> to know if I can go for HTB right away. I mean, is it stable? I'm
> trying to implement it in my company and thus stability and performance
> is big issue in this case.
> Please correct me if i'm wrong.
It's not because cbq is in the kernel for a long time that it is stable. I
know more bugs/problems with cbq then with htb.
I think htb is better because :
- design
- less obscure options
- actively maintained
- faster
- included in kernel 2.4.20 :)
Just my 2¢
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-29 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-29 5:40 [LARTC] HTB or CBQ ? brt_informatics
2002-09-29 9:18 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2002-09-30 10:52 ` SERBAN Rares
2002-09-30 15:15 ` Stef Coene
2002-09-30 15:26 ` Michael T. Babcock
2002-09-30 15:37 ` Stef Coene
2002-10-01 12:56 ` Michael T. Babcock
2002-10-01 13:11 ` Robert Penz
2002-10-01 13:20 ` Michael T. Babcock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103329117917626@msgid-missing \
--to=stef.coene@docum.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.