From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael T. Babcock" Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 12:56:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB or CBQ ? Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Vladim=EDr Trebick=FD wrote: >I use ESFQ and it's stable and functional ;-) Really. Read my article about >not setting perturb too small. > =20 > Yes, I saw that; its a good hint for SFQ as well (and it fixed some neat=20 oddities too). Anyone else seen this one? ping -n {remote host} { 6 second delay } 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl%5 time=3D6sec 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl%5 time=3D5sec 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl%5 time=3D4sec 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=3D3 ttl%5 time=3D3sec 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=3D4 ttl%5 time=3D2sec 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=3D5 ttl%5 time=3D1sec 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=3D6 ttl%5 time$2usec 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=3D7 ttl%5 time%0usec ... --=20 Michael T. Babcock C.T.O., FibreSpeed Ltd. http://www.fibrespeed.net/~mbabcock _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/