From: Stephane Ouellette <ouellettes@videotron.ca>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] Problem routing packets using fwmark and netfilter
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 16:28:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103400817319577@msgid-missing> (raw)
Folks,
I will install in a near future a firewall/router on which two NICs
are connected to two different ISPs. I have read the iproute2
documentation and have been able to do some policy routing.
SUCCESSFUL TEST
---------------
Let's start with a simple ping test. I will ping two known computers on
the internet using different gateways.
Following are the commands I have entered to enable policy routing using
the destination address as the routing key (Suppose that eth0 and
eth1 are the NICs connected to my ISPs):
ip route add $LAN1 dev eth0 src $MYADDR1 table lan1
ip route add default via $GATEWAY1 table lan1
ip route add $LAN2 dev eth1 src $MYADDR2 table lan2
ip route add default via $GATEWAY2 table lan2
ip rule add to $TESTMACHINE1 table lan1
ip rule add to $TESTMACHINE2 table lan2
Now, pinging $TESTMACHINE1 or $TESTMACHINE2 shows the expected behaviour.
MY PROBLEM
----------
Suppose I want to do some policy routing using the fwmark as a routing
key. I should have entered the following commands:
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p icmp --icmp-type \
-d $TESTMACHINE1 -j MARK --set-mark 1
iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -p icmp --icmp-type \
-d $TESTMACHINE2 -j MARK --set-mark 2
ip rule add fwmark 1 table lan1
ip rule add fwmark 2 table lan2
Now, pinging $TESTMACHINE1 or $TESTMACHINE2 always uses the same
gateway! The iptables rule counters increment as expected but it seems
that the fwmark has no effect on routing !!!
MY CONFIGURATION
----------------
RedHat 7.2 on i686
Kernel 2.4.20-pre9 (all options related to advanced routing are enabled)
Today's CVS snapshot of the Netfilter project
Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated !!!
Stephane.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-07 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-07 16:28 Stephane Ouellette [this message]
2002-10-07 17:11 ` [LARTC] Problem routing packets using fwmark and netfilter Ramin Alidousti
2002-10-07 22:21 ` Stephane Ouellette
2002-10-07 23:51 ` Ramin Alidousti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103400817319577@msgid-missing \
--to=ouellettes@videotron.ca \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.