All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] CBQ broken in RedHat 8.0?
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:09:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103571344114029@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-103567646931154@msgid-missing>

On Sunday 27 October 2002 04:10, Robert Davidson wrote:
> When I was playing with wondershaper I ran into this too.
>
> After reviewing the docs I think that the wondershaper merely gives certain
> traffic more bandwidth, but does not prioritize it.  The CBQ qdisc does not
> appear to prioritize. If you reduce your uplink rate to less than your
> slowest transfer speed, you should get the results you expect.
>
> I am not sure what it would do for latency - during my testing with VoIP,
> the wondershaper put packets in the right queues, but could not prevent
> computer traffic from hogging the bandwidth.
>
> What would be ideal is a bandwidth limiting CBQ qdisc encapsulating a PRIO
> qdisc. I think that can only be obtained with an HBT qdisc (I would be
> delighted to be corrected!). 
It can be done, but I (stil) didn't tried it.  If you read the htb pages 
carefully, you can get very low delays.  To do so, you have to give the class 
a lower priority AND you have to be sure you never send more data in the 
class then it's rate.  (chapter 6 on the htb manual)

I am installing SuSE 8.1 so that I have kernel
> 2.4.19 which I hope will accept the HBT and tc patches (from
> <http://www.docum.org>'s pointer to HBT's home page) better than SuSE 7.3's
> 2.4.10.
Why upgrading your SUSE?  You can also download 2.4.19 from ftp.kernel.org and 
patch with the lates htb patch ??

> If anyone has sample scripts used for prioritizing VoIP traffic over a VPN
> (or over anything else), I would really appreciate a chance to see what was
> done. The only way I have been able to get good VoIP quality is by reducing
> the bandwidth available to everything else to unacceptably low levels.
I know a lot of people are trying it, but I have no such script.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-27 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-26 23:53 [LARTC] CBQ broken in RedHat 8.0? Neil Aggarwal
2002-10-27  3:10 ` Robert Davidson
2002-10-27 10:09 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2002-10-27 17:08 ` Robert Davidson
2002-10-27 17:23 ` David Boreham
2002-10-28 11:40 ` Aigars Mahinovs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103571344114029@msgid-missing \
    --to=stef.coene@docum.org \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.