[LARTC] Download Bandwidth policing...

[Shaheen Hossain <shaheen@o2oSoft.com>]

Dear Stef, I have read your reply with much interest. Would you be able
to give us some examples of putting the high bandwidth hogger in one
class and rest in other with burstable capability? Thanks a million in
advance.

-- Shaheen Hossain
Bangladesh.

---------------Included Msg-----------------------------
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
Organization: None
To: "Gabor Csuri" <csucsu@dunasor.hu>, <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] traffic control based on the downloaded bytes
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 18:04:01 +0100

On Wednesday 06 November 2002 11:09, Gabor Csuri wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>  I'm new on this list. I'm the admin of the server in our house.
> We have a 768k/128k DSL line.
> There are 11 flats using this bandwith without any control.
> Some of them are "high donwloader" and the browsing speed is
decreasing a
> lot when the downloaders are waken up. :(
> I have an idea how the downloaders and the browsers can use this
bandwith
> without any conflict.
> My question is: Is it possible with iproute2 ?
> My idea: I define a bandwith to downloaders (maybe 512k).
> If any of the downloading thread exceed a limit (maybe 4Mbyte) it
passed
> into the 512k bandwith.
> How can I do this trick?
There is a length match in iptables.  But I don't know if it will work.
You can also use squid and uses the delay pools in squid.

But why don't you put all the bandwidth eating traffic in 1 class and
give it 
a lower bandwith?  If there is no other traffic, they can use the full
link, 
but if there is other traffic, other traffis is served first.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/