All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Simon <ciccio@kiosknet.com.br>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] many ways to do load balancing (or not?)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:00:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103797010800813@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-103788125614081@msgid-missing>

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:30:35 -0200
Andreas Hasenack <andreas@conectiva.com.br> wrote:

> Em Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:55:05PM -0200, Christoph Simon escreveu:
> > My understanding is, that for equalize to work, all lines must go to
> > the same point and that must not be the end point. Also, this same
> > point must implement the equalize very much the same way.
> 
> What is it that you call a "point" here (destination)? The same ISP? The
> same network?
> 
> I understand that it should be the same ISP because of egress filtering,
> that is, one ISP should block packets with a source address that doesn't
> belong to the ISP supplying the link.

I was thinking of a configuration like:

	Satelite                 Main-Office

	     -> ISP1 -m-
	LAN1 -> ISP2 -m- ISPx -> linux-router2 -> ISP-BIG ->
	     -> ISP3 -m-

If I have an office with one big Internet tube (e.g., MBs), I can put
"linux-router2" there. Then all satelite offices could use one or more
modems to reach this router. That linux-router2 would NAT everybody
coming from the modems and forward the packets to ISP-BIG. Nobody in
LAN1 would even attempt to reach linux-router2, which is the last
point where their actually source addresses are known. With equalize
this should allow for a packetwise loadbalancing to increase the
effective bandwidth even for a single file transfer between a host in
LAN1 and ISP-BIG. In this configuration, all modem lines go finally to
one point (linux-router2) and that is not the endpoint. In fact, all
internal clients would use linux-router2 as the default gateway. No
cooperation of any ISP is required.

This configuration makes sense if LAN1 and linux-router2 are in
different cities and either LAN1 has no other reliable choice than
modems or wants redundancy. ISP-BIG also needs to be cheap and
reliable enough for this to make sense.

As I said before, I didn't play too much with equalize, but can't see
a essencially different scenario for a packet-wise loadbalancing.

-- 
Christoph Simon
ciccio@kiosknet.com.br
---
^X^C
q
quit
:q
^C
end
x
exit
ZZ
^D
?
help
.
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-11-22 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-21 12:19 [LARTC] many ways to do load balancing (or not?) Andreas Hasenack
2002-11-21 17:46 ` Ashok N N
2002-11-21 19:11 ` Andreas Hasenack
2002-11-21 20:00 ` Ramin Alidousti
2002-11-21 22:20 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2002-11-21 22:55 ` Christoph Simon
2002-11-21 23:41 ` Christoph Simon
2002-11-22  0:06 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2002-11-22  0:24 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2002-11-22  1:17 ` Ashok N N
2002-11-22 12:28 ` Andreas Hasenack
2002-11-22 12:30 ` Andreas Hasenack
2002-11-22 12:39 ` Andreas Hasenack
2002-11-22 12:41 ` Andreas Hasenack
2002-11-22 13:00 ` Christoph Simon [this message]
2002-11-22 13:26 ` Vincent Jaussaud
2002-11-22 18:05 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2002-11-22 18:21 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2002-11-22 18:37 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2002-11-22 18:47 ` William L. Thomson Jr.
2002-11-22 20:34 ` Andreas Hasenack
2002-11-25 13:20 ` Vincent Jaussaud

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103797010800813@msgid-missing \
    --to=ciccio@kiosknet.com.br \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.