From: Abraham van der Merwe <abz@frogfoot.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB and theory
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 22:18:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-103947246114318@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-103945416224487@msgid-missing>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2044 bytes --]
Hi Stef!
> > I'll let HTB to automatically compute the values for 'burst' and
> > 'cburst'. The problem is elsewhere. What are the correct values for
> > 'rate' and 'ceil' of 11:2 class in this case? In fact, total value of
> > 'ceil's from all sub-classes exceeds 5000Kbit, so there are moments when
> > the bandwidth that comes from my ISP is bigger than guaranteed bandwidth.
> > Is there some kind a theory that says how to establish the values of
> > 'rate's and 'ceil's from the parent and its sub-classes?
> There are some rules : ceil of child <= ceil of parent, sum (child rates) <=
> rate of parent .... You don't have to follow this rules, but the final
> shaping result can be strange.
> See the faq page on www.docum.org.
What would be nice is if you could document what happens when
a) child ceil > parent ceil
b) child rate > parent ceil
c) child ceil > parent rate
d) child rate > parent rate
How does this influence the shaping results and the shaping of other
classes? I've actually asked a similar question before: If you have
1:1
/ \
/ \
1:2 1:3
/|\ \------
/ | \ \ \
1:4 1:5 1:6 1:7 1:8
if 1:7 and 1:8 respects the rate/ceil of 1:3 and 1:3 respects the rate/ceil
of 1:1, but 1:4 does not respect the rate/ceil of 1:2 and 1:2 respects the
rate/ceil of 1:1, does the shaping of 1:3 work as normal and only those
classes under 1:2 are adversely affected or not? from your previous answer,
it seems that the classes under 1:3 would not be affected, but I would love
to know why. what happens with 1:4 requests some bandwidth which 1:2 does
not have...
--
Regards
Abraham
NEWARK has been REZONED!! DES MOINES has been REZONED!!
___________________________________________________
Abraham vd Merwe [ZR1BBQ] - Frogfoot Networks
P.O. Box 3472, Matieland, Stellenbosch, 7602
Cell: +27 82 565 4451 Http: http://www.frogfoot.net/
Email: abz@frogfoot.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-09 22:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-09 17:14 [LARTC] HTB and theory Catalin Bucur
2002-12-09 18:22 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-09 20:27 ` Catalin Bucur
2002-12-09 21:22 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-09 21:45 ` Catalin Bucur
2002-12-09 22:18 ` Abraham van der Merwe [this message]
2002-12-10 12:33 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-10 12:40 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-10 13:28 ` Abraham van der Merwe
2002-12-10 21:23 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-12 8:36 ` Abraham van der Merwe
2002-12-12 10:49 ` Stef Coene
2002-12-12 11:19 ` Abraham van der Merwe
2002-12-12 18:32 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-103947246114318@msgid-missing \
--to=abz@frogfoot.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.