From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 21:57:27 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] compiling cls_u32 sch_htb and bridge into the kernel
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-104197671227935@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-104186367231275@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104186367231275@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

On Monday 06 January 2003 15:33, Victor Cassar wrote:
> Hi fellows:
>
> I=B4m wondering about compiling cls_u32 sch_htb and
> bridge into the kernel
>
> Are there any advantages or disadvantages doing this
> in terms of stability or crash problems?
I'm not sure, but once the module is loaded, it's part of the kernel.  So i=
t=20
doesn't mather.

Stef

--=20

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/