From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:33:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] marking Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 28 January 2003 22:47, Jay Wineinger wrote: > Ok, that KPTD helps a bit. Question about that though, it seems that a > forwarded packet will have 3 chances at getting marked (PRE,FORWARD,POST); > is that correct? Similarly, a packet originating on the QoS box will have > 2 mark chances (OUTPUT and POST). If thats correct, is there any > advantage to using one or the other. I dont see why you wouldnt just do > everything in POSTROUTING since all packets go there eventually according > to the diagram. I always mark in PREROUTING. Don't ask me why. But if you want to mark in POSTROUTING, why not? Stef PS I have problems sending you an email : Domain wnoc.com not found ??? Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/