From: Tomas Bonnedahl <tomas@yes.nu>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] most out of qos
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 15:44:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104445994220942@msgid-missing> (raw)
to get most out of qos in general, would the best thing be to set up qos on both ends of a bottleneck with both ingress and egress
filtering? the reason for asking is because we have a 2mbit connection with egress filtering qos, the problem is that we experience
most downloads compared to uploades and therefor the egress filtering doesnt provide much help.
what we could do is to get ingress filtering on our side here, but i dont know how much that would help really, the data has already
passed the bottleneck in the path. so, my question, would i experience any different delay if adding ingress filtering?
it is a 2mbit fiber stub network which looks pretty much like this:
lan - router - fw - isp - internet
the egress qos is at the moment at the router which pretty much says "prioritize interactive sessions".
since the filtering for qos is rather simple, just telnet/ssh to a certain host, should i contact my isp and ask them to set some
egress qos going to our network on the cisco router that is at their place? btw, anyone know how good the qos is on cisco 2600?
thanks for you time, best regards
tomas bonnedahl
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-05 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-05 15:44 Tomas Bonnedahl [this message]
2003-02-05 21:13 ` [LARTC] most out of qos Stef Coene
2003-02-05 21:28 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 10:04 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 16:23 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 16:29 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 16:47 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 16:49 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-02-06 16:58 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 17:01 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-02-06 17:11 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
2003-02-06 17:22 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-06 17:37 ` Tomas Bonnedahl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104445994220942@msgid-missing \
--to=tomas@yes.nu \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.