From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] API using cbq / tc ?
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 18:16:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104498749319006@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104453716713244@msgid-missing>
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 17:59, Martin Devera wrote:
> > > that doing it all on the client would be better, but for a distributed
> > > viewing, a webpage makes a nice interface.
> >
> > Still, rrdtool is not made for real time graphing. A 10 sec interval is
> > not real-time. For me, real-time is now. And for that you need
> > something that can graph the files locally like java or vb.
>
> Hmm, typicaly I agree with Stef but here I'm not sure.
> Speed is derivative of transfered byte count and as such
> it is dependent on time. Because we can't compute perfect
> derivative we have to use difference - and it is always
> computed as average of some time interval (30sec in HTB).
> So if you use 5s interval in rrd it seems ok for me (it
> is what i plan to do here).
If you receive an update each second, you have the feeling it's realtime.
It's slow enough to understand the data and it's fast enough to feel it as
real-time. It's also fast enought that you get new data before you are tired
to look at the old data.
For other people, real time can be 5 seconds It depends on how much beer
they had :)
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-11 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-06 13:20 [LARTC] API using cbq / tc ? Srikanth
2003-02-07 2:28 ` S Mohan
2003-02-07 4:37 ` Srikanth
2003-02-07 7:44 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-08 7:02 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2003-02-08 10:39 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-08 13:04 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2003-02-08 13:22 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-09 3:45 ` Ming-Ching Tiew
2003-02-09 7:26 ` Henry Yen
2003-02-09 13:39 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-10 1:58 ` mingching.tiew
2003-02-10 8:59 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-10 18:01 ` Jay Wineinger
2003-02-10 18:20 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-11 16:59 ` Martin Devera
2003-02-11 18:16 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2003-02-12 8:29 ` devik
2003-02-12 17:45 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-13 8:30 ` devik
2003-02-13 10:36 ` mingching.tiew
2003-02-13 18:39 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-13 18:40 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-14 3:58 ` mingching.tiew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104498749319006@msgid-missing \
--to=stef.coene@docum.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.