From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] quantum value for voip
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:37:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104516170929877@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104509464522905@msgid-missing>
On Thursday 13 February 2003 17:00, Victor Cassar wrote:
> Thanks Stef
>
> Yep i missunderstood the quantum concept (it´s clear
> now), but since my voip class was configured with
> enough bw this doesn´t matter
>
> Reading more on docum.org, i find hte possible cause
> of the delays i was using sfq (128p queue) on the leaf
> i removed sfq from the voip class
>
> I will try also with other disciplines.. like tbf
> just to have a deeper understanding of queuing in real
> life applications
Tbf will not change nything. Htb is acutally a tbf but with classes.
> Are there any recomendation on which queuing
> discipline to use with voip?
> (my stats show 100 bytes per packet average in voip)
Why not a simple fifo? You can adapt the size of it from the command line.
> i´m doing more tests now and i´ll re re-read the full
> lartc. doc
Keep us informed.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-13 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-12 23:59 [LARTC] quantum value for voip Victor Cassar
2003-02-13 7:34 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-13 16:00 ` Victor Cassar
2003-02-13 18:37 ` Stef Coene [this message]
2003-02-14 0:13 ` Mathieu Deziel
2003-02-14 0:18 ` Mathieu Deziel
2003-02-14 8:01 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-14 13:38 ` Mathieu Deziel
2003-02-15 2:39 ` Victor Cassar
2003-02-17 13:05 ` Mathieu Deziel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104516170929877@msgid-missing \
--to=stef.coene@docum.org \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.