All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartek Krajnik <bartek@bicom.pl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] load balancing wo nat
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:19:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104566804629121@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104559009603052@msgid-missing>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1624 bytes --]

On 18-02-2003 at 06:40:23PM +0100, Kertész Viktor wrote:
KV> Dear All,
KV> 
KV> I've read the message with the similar subject but I have a different
KV> problem. I've got this network:
KV>    INTERNET
KV>       |
KV> +------------+
KV> |firewall/nat|
KV> +------------+
KV>    |  \
KV>    .    .
KV>    .1     .2
KV>    |      \
KV> +------+ +------+
KV> |router| |router|
KV> +------+ +------+
KV> 10.0.2.1   10.0.2.3
KV>     \      /
KV>     +------+
KV>     |switch|
KV>     +------+
KV>         |10.0.2.2
KV>   +------------+
KV>   |linux router|
KV>   +------------+
KV>         |10.1.0.1
KV> 	|
KV> 	|10.1.0.0/16
KV>   +--------------+
KV>   |client network|
KV>   +--------------+
KV> My question is that how can I balance upward traffic on linux router.
KV> This box doesn't do nat. Is it possible to put every second packets onto
KV> the second router(10.0.2.3)? Now default gw is 10.0.2.1 so every packets
KV> going upward is on link1. Downlink is balanced by IP routing on firewall
KV> but uplink is not balanced. Thank you in advance!
KV> 
KV> Vitya
KV> 
http://lartc.org/lartc.pdf
Chapter 4.2

Martin A. Brown wrote in some message:
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2003q1/006781.html
http://trash.net/~kaber/
http://trash.net/~kaber/equalize_2.4.18.patch

Rgds,
  Bartek.
--
GPG-key-ID:  0x948DE45D -- visit http://www.keyserver.net
Fingerprint: 95E9 8E2D 1801 7864 2244  6EAA 03E5 764D 948D E45D

The great baby you see there is not yet out of his swaddling-clouts.
                                                           Shakespeare, Hamlet.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2003-02-19 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-18 17:40 [LARTC] load balancing wo nat Kertész Viktor
2003-02-19 15:19 ` Bartek Krajnik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104566804629121@msgid-missing \
    --to=bartek@bicom.pl \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.