From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: raptor <raptor@tvskat.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 08:32:38 +0000
Subject: [LARTC] [tcng] example
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-104572995707793@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

hi,
i would like to use just one interface to shape/police traffic, lets have following config :


users -----[eth1]==[eth0]------ Internet


what I think to do is :

$m1 = SLB(cir 20kbps, cbs 10kB);

dev eth1 {
 
ingress{
	class(<$i1>) if ip_dst = 192.168.0.5 && SLB_else_drop($m1);
	class(<$i2>) if ip_dst = 192.168.0.5 && SLB_else_drop($m1);
	drop if 1;
}
egress {
	class(<$c1>) if ip_dst = 192.168.0.5;
	class(<$c2>) if ip_dst = 192.168.0.6;
	 ......
	drop if 1;

	htb() {
		$c1 = class(rate 20kbps, rq2 1) {sfq;};
		$c2 = class(rate 100kbps, rq2 10) {sfq;};
	}
}
}


My main question is about INGRESS.. I see in the docs there is many other metering primitives and can't find which one is better to use.. From what I know it is not possible to shape traffic on ingress interface..
What about this instead of SLB:

	$m1 = bucket(rate 20kbps, burst 10kB);

	class(<$i1>) if ip_dst = 192.168.0.5 && conform $m1;

what is the difference..
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/