From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hanumantha kavuluru Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:40:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Need some help on HTB and IMQ MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-85426278-1046119233=:25644" Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: To: lartc@vger.kernel.org --0-85426278-1046119233=:25644 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Stef, That is right. I want to do up+down = fixed bandwidth. Thanks for your help. Hemanth Stef Coene wrote:On Monday 24 February 2003 21:19, hanumantha kavuluru wrote: > Hi All, > Thanks for the help. Stef, our product is already out in the market with > 2.4.18 kernel. So if we change the kernel, we will have to go through a > full QA cycle which is something we don't want to do :). Ok > BTW, I would like > to have global limits on the Bandwidth per user irrespective of which > interface the traffic might go.Can i do this without using IMQ? So you want up + down = fixed bandwidth? Then you need IMQ. > Also i want > to do my own classification by setting the skb->priority field with the > appropriate class ID. Is it possible to use this kind of classification > with IMQ and HTB? I don't know the internals of tc, but I think you can do. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more --0-85426278-1046119233=:25644 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Stef,

That is right. I want to do up+down = fixed bandwidth. Thanks for your help.

Hemanth

 Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org> wrote:

On Monday 24 February 2003 21:19, hanumantha kavuluru wrote:
> Hi All,
> Thanks for the help. Stef, our product is already out in the market with
> 2.4.18 kernel. So if we change the kernel, we will have to go through a
> full QA cycle which is something we don't want to do :).
Ok

> BTW, I would like
> to have global limits on the Bandwidth per user irrespective of which
> interface the traffic might go.Can i do this without using IMQ?
So you want up + down = fixed bandwidth? Then you need IMQ.

> Also i want
> to do my own classification by setting the skb->priority field with the
> appropriate class ID. Is it possible to use this kind of classification
> with IMQ and HTB?
I don't know the internals of tc, but I think you can do.

Stef

--

stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as band width manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more --0-85426278-1046119233=:25644-- _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/