From: Dragan Zubac <f2zubac@chiquita.www.yu>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Need some help on HTB and IMQ
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:38:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104616934704019@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104611473913443@msgid-missing>
Hi,
There is no options at all to 'shape' upload+download=fixed bandwidth
without using IMQ virtual device ? So if somebody is planning to give
customer fixed bandwidth regarless if a customer is 'uploading' or
'downloading',he (or she:) MUST use IMQ virtual device ? Anybody did some
tests of configuring same traffic shaping with and without using IMQ
device ? How IMQ device (kernel) will behave on heavy load traffic
(like VoIP,gaming,other 'real-time' traffic) comparing on mashine without
using IMQ virtual device ?
Does anybody did some test on using u32 filter and fw filter ? How does
each one behave on same mashine,same kernel,same traffic shaping
configuration ?
f2zubac
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Stef Coene wrote:
> On Monday 24 February 2003 21:19, hanumantha kavuluru wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > Thanks for the help. Stef, our product is already out in the market with
> > 2.4.18 kernel. So if we change the kernel, we will have to go through a
> > full QA cycle which is something we don't want to do :).
> Ok
>
> > BTW, I would like
> > to have global limits on the Bandwidth per user irrespective of which
> > interface the traffic might go.Can i do this without using IMQ?
> So you want up + down = fixed bandwidth? Then you need IMQ.
>
> > Also i want
> > to do my own classification by setting the skb->priority field with the
> > appropriate class ID. Is it possible to use this kind of classification
> > with IMQ and HTB?
> I don't know the internals of tc, but I think you can do.
>
> Stef
>
> --
>
> stef.coene@docum.org
> "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
> http://www.docum.org/
> #lartc @ irc.oftc.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-25 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-24 19:24 [LARTC] Need some help on HTB and IMQ hanumantha kavuluru
2003-02-24 19:42 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-24 20:19 ` hanumantha kavuluru
2003-02-24 20:23 ` Stef Coene
2003-02-24 20:40 ` hanumantha kavuluru
2003-02-25 10:38 ` Dragan Zubac [this message]
2003-02-25 18:32 ` Stef Coene
2003-03-04 6:36 ` hare ram
2003-03-04 6:39 ` S Mohan
2003-03-04 6:58 ` hare ram
2003-03-04 8:33 ` Martin A. Brown
2003-03-04 11:59 ` hare ram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104616934704019@msgid-missing \
--to=f2zubac@chiquita.www.yu \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.