From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 22:10:28 +0000 Subject: Re: Re[2]: [LARTC] CBQ Traffic control not working Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 12 March 2003 22:28, Mugur TOMITA wrote: > Stef Coene, thank you for your feed-back. I have already read > docum.org... The tests proved a difference of max 20Kbps between > theory and real life for cbq. That's because cbq has to guess the conditions on the link and it uses some averages. Like packet size. > In my case practically nobody is limited... > In my scripts there are classes with prio 8... you say max is 7... > could this be the problem? No. If you do tc -s -d class show dev eth0 you propably see prio 7 for the prio 8 classes. > Could it be possible that on hard traffic cbq to just let pass > packets? This is a stupid question I guess... > Do I have a chance solving the problem by swtching to HTB? Yes and no :) htb is easier to understand/implement, there are no obscure options. But if your problem is setup related, reimplementing the rules in htb can create the same problem. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/