Re: [LARTC] CBQ problem

[Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>]

On Thursday 13 March 2003 11:19, Liu Zhiyong wrote:
> Some one told me that "bounded", and "isolated" don't work sometimes, is it
> true?
Yes.  You better remove all the isolated parameters.
I did some tests.  You can find the results on www.docum.org on the test page.  
I don't have a direct link available to the page with the results.

Stef

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Liu Zhiyong" <liuzhiyo@comp.nus.edu.sg>
> To: <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:49 PM
> Subject: [LARTC] CBQ problem
>
> > this is my CBQ configuration:
> >
> > DEV=eth1
> > tc qdisc del dev $DEV root
> > tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1: cbq avpkt 100 bandwidth 10Mbit cell
> > 8 tc class add dev $DEV parent 1: classid 1:1 cbq rate 10kbit allot 1500
>
> prio
>
> > 1 cell 8 bounded isolated
> > tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:10 cbq rate 1Mbit allot 1500
>
> prio
>
> > 2 avpkt 15 bounded isolated
> > tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:20 cbq rate 7Mbit allot 1500
>
> prio
>
> > 2 avpkt 60 bounded isolated
> > tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:30 cbq rate 200kbit allot 1500
> > prio 2 avpkt 60 bounded isolated
> > tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:10 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
> > tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:20 handle 20: sfq perturb 10
> > tc qdisc add dev $DEV parent 1:30 handle 30: sfq perturb 10
> > tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 match u8 0x00
> > 0x00 at 0 flowid 1:30
> > tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol qroute_uni prio 2 u32 match u8
> > 0x40 0xff at 14 flowid 1:20
> > tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol qroute_multi prio 3 u32 match
> > u8 0x40 0xff at 14 flowid 1:20
> > tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol qroute_uni prio 4 u32 match u8
> > 0x00 0x00 at 14 flowid 1:10
> > tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol qroute_multi prio 5 u32 match
> > u8 0x00 0x00 at 14 flowid 1:10
> >
> > I want to shape class 1:1 to 10kbit, but it is not successfull. As I know
> > when class 1:1 is shaped to 10Kbits, its children, can not exceed it,
> > even if the child's rate is more than class 1:1. But After I applied this
> > tc configuration, I notice that the bandwidth of class 1:30 is around
> > 200Kbit (not shape to less than 10Kbit). anyone can help me?
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------
> > This email was sent using SquirrelMail.
> >    "Webmail for nuts!"
> > http://squirrelmail.org/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/