From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:05:34 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Warnings with and without r2q
Message-Id: <marc-lartc-104757179227137@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-lartc-104749414411587@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104749414411587@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday 13 March 2003 00:18, Eduardo Bejar wrote:
> Thanks Stef,
>
> Finally I understood the r2q value. I defined 'r2q 2'. And for the classes
> that gave me the warning I found out that rate / r2q was < 1500. For this
> case I use 'quantum 1500'. In the other classes that had warning; rate /
> r2q was > 60000, so I use 'quantum 60000'.
>
> Now I don=B4t get any warnings. =3D)
:)

Stef

--=20

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/