All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "S Mohan" <smohan@vsnl.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Bridge+QOS
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 01:52:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-104795236913380@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-104788409929247@msgid-missing>

Works very well. Have been using it for 8 months so. Bridging provides
transparency on network and does not affect the tc operation in any
manner. If you want marking of packets and routing based on fwmark, then
you'll have to juggle a bit as the packet flow in a bridge is different
from that of a router. Marking is possible only on the FORWARD
Chain/table. Alternatively, you can force packets thro' iptables chains
- prerouting, nat, input, forward, postrouting, output using ebtables.
I'm not sure if ebtables can mark packets. Have not looked deep enough.

Mohan

-----Original Message-----
From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl]
On Behalf Of hare ram
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 12:35 PM
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: [LARTC] Bridge+QOS


Hi all


iam setting up a bridge with QOS Services

i would like to you to have coments on setup, is this works

i ahve setup like this

LAN--eth1(Bridge)eth0--router--Internet


in LAN i have users 10 people
i would like to have QOS Services for 5 people burstable
5 People commited ( bounded b/w what i have)

Can i use TC+htb to make this setup
is the tc+htb work with my transparent bridge

thanks
hare

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-18  1:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-17  6:55 [LARTC] Bridge+QOS hare ram
2003-03-17 17:19 ` Stef Coene
2003-03-18  1:52 ` S Mohan [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-17  2:14 [LARTC] bridge & QoS Roberto Scattini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-104795236913380@msgid-missing \
    --to=smohan@vsnl.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.