From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stef Coene Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 20:55:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] heavy loads Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 09 April 2003 13:02, Esteban Ribicic wrote: > under heavy traffic (15 megas over 100 megas nic) .. just for creating > four classes each with his rate and prios wich is more convinient? > > actually cbq+sfq is killing my computer (intel 1.4G, 512 ram)..maybe cbq > calculations are too much and htb or tbf would fit better? I think htb will do a much better job in shaping high speed connections. Or just try it out and let us know :) Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/